15
Jan
13

‘roids, Oprah, Lance Armstrong and Sheryl Crow

I feel like I am watching a very slow version Melrose Place – a bunch of good-looking people running about, emoting fiercely …

1) Armstrong used steroids and won the Tour De France and that’s too bad, but it’s not something the average person can do even if they do take steroids. What does it mean? It means the world is a complicated place?

2) Why is Oprah focused on gossip as opposed to stopping the war? I know it’s a business but she’s done very well, and she has the potential to contribute more to her audience – the people who have given her so much, so why not give them something of real value instead of a car which is like giving a few random audience members a hit of dope?

3) Sheryl Crow (I just wanted to mention her)

Advertisement

0 Responses to “‘roids, Oprah, Lance Armstrong and Sheryl Crow”



  1. Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


Twitter

Blog Stats

  • 19,882 hits
January 2013
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

%d bloggers like this: